CALIFORNIA – California lawmakers are advancing two measures that would expand the state’s use of automated traffic enforcement, with one bill already headed to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.
AB 289, authored by Assemblymember Matt Haney, would allow the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to place speed cameras in highway work zones when construction or maintenance crews are present.
In 2021, more than 9,500 collisions occurred in California construction zones on highways. This resulted in an estimated 2,971 injuries and 73 fatalities, including both construction workers and drivers, according to the bill analysis.
The legislation requires clear “Photo Enforced” warning signs, plus speed limit signs with flashing beacons and speed feedback signs, posted 500 feet to one mile, before each speed safety system.
A first offense for driving 11–15 mph over the limit triggers a mailed warning notice. Repeat offenders would face a $50 fine. Driving 16–25 mph over the limit incurs a $100 fine; 26–99 mph results in a $200 fine. Drivers exceeding 100 mph would receive a $500 fine.
The bill limits the number of cameras in use statewide to 35 at any one time.
On September 10, the Assembly concurred with the Senate amendments, advancing the bill for enrollment and presentation to Newsom.
Red-Light Safety Cameras
Meanwhile, SB 720 introduced by Senator Angelique Ashby, seeks to modernize California’s red-light camera rules.
The bill allows local governments to use automated traffic enforcement (ATE) systems for traffic signal violations and issue civil – not criminal, penalties.
“When it comes to crash reductions, an IIHS study comparing large cities with red light safety cameras to those without found the devices reduced the fatal red light running crash rate by 21% and the rate of all types of fatal crashes at signalized intersections by 14%,” according to Ashby.
Current law requires clear photographic evidence of a driver’s identity before a ticket can be issued.
The bill would instead allow citations to be sent to the registered owner of the vehicle using a rear-plate photo if the driver cannot be identified.
The measure also requires notices to include a photo of the traffic signal and a link to the video evidence. The bill prohibits jurisdictions from shortening yellow-light intervals at camera-equipped intersections.
First-time offenders would be issued a $100 fine. Repeat offenders could face fines up to $500.
SB 720 passed the Senate earlier this year and is now awaiting final votes in the Assembly.
National Motorists Association criticizes bills
The proposals have drawn criticism.
Writing in opposition to AB 289, the National Motorists Association argued severe injuries and fatalities involving highway construction and maintenance workers due to motorists speeding in state highway work zones are relatively rare.
The group also argued in opposition to SB 720, claiming it transforms red-light camera programs into high-volume, low-oversight ticketing operations.
“Cities that don’t generate enough revenue through these tactics often end their programs, confirming that financial viability—not safety—is the driving force,” said the association.
RELATED: California Legislature approves bill on housing for sexually violent predators